USE It means an unidentified submerged object: UAP, which seems to affect water or transit between air and sea. Reports such as “Tic Tac” from 2004, Aguadilla Thermal Video 2013 and the Shag Harbor housing from 1967 suggest an UAP approach, jumping, decrease, and even again appear from the ocean. This feature examines a practical question: are such events real, Where Would these craftsmanship most likely travel – and why would the ocean be the perfect cover?
USO 101: Why the ocean makes sense
The sea offers hiding. It absorbs radar and featherlight, suppresses sound and provides a huge volume with low movement for maneuvering. In addition, a significant part of the US and NATO sensors network focuses on air Threats, leaving gaps under water or near the surface. Historical Navy Hydrophones networks (e.g. SOSUS/IUSS) do not cover every coastal shelf, and their data is mainly classified. In compact: the ocean is a natural dead point.
Key cases often cited with USO
- Nimitz “Tic Tac”, 2004: The carrier's pilots described a sleek, winged object and a “whipping” ocean stain, as if something was just below the surface.
- Aguadilla, Puerto Rico, 2013: The DHS thermal film shows a petite object flying low above land and water at night, it seems that it enters the sea and later divided into two.
- Shag Harbor, Nova Scotia, 1967: Witnesses reported an object descending into the water; Divers searched the sea bottom without any rubbish.
- South California Training Ranges, 2019: Navy ships logged in the swarm of an unknown ship near the canal islands – illustrating how crowded areas of the air test complicate identification.
“Highways USO”: probable viewing corridors
On the basis of bathymetry, movement patterns and infrastructure, several corridors are distinguished. These are not evidence of uap-only zones based on data in which unusual activity would be more complex to track and easier to confuse routine movement.
1) deep trenches adjacent to the coast
- Puerto Rico Trench: The deepest point of the Atlantic is north of the island – it took place to Aguadilla and close busy air/sea belts.
- Monterey Submarine Canyon (CA): A deep canyon near dense test ranges and shipping, with a regular sea layer and night fog that degrades visualizations.
- Tonga, the Philippines and Kuril-Kamchatka ditch: Extremely deep Pacific corridors with scarce surface traffic over long sections.
2) submarine cable points and sensors
Global internet cables converge in coastal “landing stations”. These zones run surveys, ROV and maintenance activity, creating noise and mess that can mask anomalies. They are also strategically necessary, so unusual action draws attention – but not always public reporting.
- Hot hubs: Guam and Hawaii; East Coast (Virginia Beach, Florida); Mediterranean Pięcia (Sycyly -m -raseille); Great Britain/Western Europe (Cornwall, Bretania); and clusters in East/South -Eastern Asia.
3) Military bands and tied sea belts
Areas with lots of sensors also have many lures: drones, balloons, training goals, flashes and classified tests. This mixture can both disclose anomalies and to mistake analysis. South California, Virginia Capes and parts of the West Pacific are the main examples.
Can our sensors lack trance events?
Night systems, compressed by phone video and non -lens Optics can turn point lights into “triangles” or make reflections look like objects. Meanwhile, underwater hydrophone lines and sea DNA boards may not cover shelves near the shore or petite bays. The UAP 2023 NASA and AARO DUP study emphasize the basic problem: our data is inconsistent, often unwanted and rarely synchronized in air/sea sensors. Until it changes, uncertainty persists.
What would be USO?
- Capturing many sensors: Synchronized video + radar + IR + Acoustic + AIS/SHIP CA DATA For the same time window.
- Visual duplicate: Independent cameras with landmarks and compass bearing.
- Water interaction: Visible awakening, spraying crown, cavitation trail or thermal plume consistent for sensors.
- Raw and metadata files: Original sources of exif, GPS and momentary preserved and shared.
Reader: Coastal Watch
Live near the coast or do you work at sea? If you filter the suspect USECapture 10-30 seconds with landmarks, and then move to the horizon, moon/stars or ships on a scale. Journal Time, GPS, bearing, wind, tideAnd note each ship, drone or activity from the explosion. If it is sheltered, check after AIS/Flightradar. Send reports (with RAW files) to the local Mon/SCU chapter and tilts from anomalien.
Lower line
Most of the “USO” noise disappears under control – a drone, balloons, birds, reflections or routine military action explains many cases. However, a few incidents showing radiant water interaction remain unresolved. If UAP uses the ocean, deep coastal canyons, cable landing zones and occupancy corridors are bright places for appearance. Thanks to the better given many sensors, we can finally separate the myth from mechanics.
Watch: Case studies
Aguadilla (2013) Thermal clip:
60 minutes: Nimitz pilots at a 2004 meeting:
Sources:
- Independent NASA research team on UAP (Methods & Data Needs), 2023 – Pdf
- Aaro Historical Record Report Vol. 1 (methodology and results), 2024 – Aaro.mil
- Imitz “Tic Tac” Zakłazd oceans – History.com |. CBS/60 minutes
- AGUADILLA 2013 thermal analysis – DHS – Pepper |. Reconstruction DU – DVIDS
- Shag Harbor 1967 Case review – Barrington commune
- Navy is full of California (2019) – War zone
- Underwater supervision history (iuss/SOSUS) – LIP
- Global cable hubs and land stations – Map of Telegeography |. FAQ
Highways Post USO: Does UFOs apply the ocean? The first on anomalien.com appeared.
Image Source: Pixabay.com
