Crop circles are one of the beautiful, mysterious and controversial landscape phenomena in the fashionable world. They are found throughout the world, appearing in countries with large areas of agricultural land. They also play a key role in changing culture through research approaches that increasingly mimic science mainstream paranormal phenomena.
Unlike UFOs, ghosts and SasquatchesCrop circles are tangible – people can touch them and step into them. At least 30 of them appeared in England last summer. In British Columbia, crop circle formations appeared in Vanderhoof, about 100 kilometers west of Prince George, in 1998 and 2001.
Crop circles and what people do with them represent one aspect my ongoing four-year research project, which explores the recent development of beliefs, practices and experiences related to the paranormal. My field work includes paranormal investigative groups within the Vancouver area and paranormal conferences in North America and England.
The latest literature in the sphere of social sciences on paranormal cultures argues that despite the rise of a secular, post-religious society, discourses in regards to the paranormal have gotten increasingly distinguished in individuals are alive within the West.
Because paranormal refers to “events or phenomena… that are beyond the scope of normal scientific understanding,” researchers have long acknowledged that paranormal phenomena intersect with “normal” on a regular basis life.
More recently, nevertheless, consequently of the influence of paranormal phenomena on popular culture and the emergence of recent spiritualities and related goods – equivalent to cauldrons, healing crystals, and online psychic services – researchers have begun to query the characterization of interest within the paranormal as subcultural or subcultural. countercultural, not mainstream.
The paranormal is becoming mainstream and scientific
Research organizations and international conferences that mobilize paranormal feelings, knowledge and practices are crucial to connecting the paranormal to the mainstream.
Relying on models and techniques that mimic conventional science, these conferences and organizations are open to the general public and have led to the democratization of paranormal research and the supply of paranormal experiences.
Scientists – especially humanists – recognize the importance of paranormal phenomena. However, persistent skepticism within the social sciences in regards to the validity of claims about paranormal phenomena and experiences has led to lack of critical research about how people actually cope with paranormal phenomena.
Academic research has already confirmed the importance of local paranormal groups and international conferences coping with paranormal phenomena – specifically ghosts, UFOs and cryptids equivalent to sasquatch. Yet we all know little in regards to the connections between these groups and conferences, and why and the way they shape people's on a regular basis lives.
My research helps explain how paranormal organizations and conferences contribute to sociocultural change.
Rationality collides with the mystery of crop circles
The study of crop circles, or “cereology”, is an example of the strain between the strange and the extraordinary.
Regardless of what we understand to be the reason behind crop circles, whether or not they are all man-made or whether or not they involve aquifers, ley lines, divine feminine energy, ancient sacred sites, ball lightning, and even UFOs, crop circles highlight a mysterious disconnect between language and visibility, as described in Jean-François Lyotard's book Discourse, character.
The French philosopher argues that there’s an unstable relationship between linguistic meaning and units of meaning, i.e. visible patterns of words, dreams, symbols and visual arts. Since no meaning has inherent meaning (meaning is all the time based on one other word and a bigger context), and art and symbols are conceptually opaque by default, they necessarily defy easy, rational understanding.
Example: Events in Summer Lectures 2017 Crop Circle Conference at Devizes, England, illustrates the issue of examining crop circles.
One day, during a conference, I went with other researchers to the crop circle and located an indication on the gate resulting in the property: “Crop circle closed.” An individual representing the organization cooperating between farmers and crop circle researchers was not present. Since we couldn't proceed without being intruded, we returned to the automotive.
During the conference, a discussion broke out in regards to the behavior of some researchers who ignored the “closed crop circle” sign, crossed the fence and approached the crop circle.
For one researcher, this transgression was disturbing since it showed a vulgar consumption of what he considered a sacred phenomenon. Another researcher who ignored the sign replied that he respected this opinion, but felt that the crop circle was “calling” to him and that it could be more disrespectful to disregard the pull of the sacred.
Researchers have had differing views on whether the “closed crop circle” sign marking the boundary ought to be respected or whether it constitutes an inappropriate obstacle to the “call” of the crop circle.
The tension between the looks and meaning of crop circles also influenced the difficult patience required to sacred geometry workshop. When drawing lines with compasses and protractors, participants had difficulty accurately reproducing the complex crop circle patterns, missing small pieces of graphite and attempting to keep the compasses from slipping on the paper. Conference organizer Karen Alexander stated that the exercises helped participants higher understand and understand crop circles.
Interpretation of paranormal cultures
My work explores the tensions between image and language, specializing in the complexity of crop circle landscapes through which enthusiasts have difficulty navigating towards, inside and away from crop circles.
Lyotard juxtaposes these events with “figural space” – elusive elements that disrupt and exceed the grasp of language. The key here is that crop circles – unlike ghosts, UFOs and sasquatches – are very tangible signs. But what they mean and what they’re stays a mystery.
Despite claims “wheel makers“, which are made by manthe sheer size and complexity of the circles belies a 100% man-made explanation.
According to researchers on the conference, when asked how they managed to make roughly 80 perfectly round circles without breaking or breaking the grain stalks, the hoaxers are unable to breed the patterns and ignore the researchers' questions.
Moreover, finding and attending to crop circles — navigating narrow and winding English country roads and determining their exact whereabouts in large fields of wheat or barley — isn’t any mean feat.
As with all the opposite paranormal research cultures I actually have studied to date, crop circle research blurs the excellence between the on a regular basis and the extraordinary. Moreover, the importance of geography within the microspaces of fields and conference facilities can’t be ignored. The regional nature and the degree to which crop circles are landscape phenomena arouses in many individuals a desire to shape their encounters with the sublime.
Image Source: Pixabay.com