My 20-minute presentation at UAP Congress on May 1, 2025 began with the following statements.
Let's be truthful: there are objects in the sky that we don't understand. When we do not understand what is 85% of the case in the universe, we invest billions of dollars to find out about the nature of this dim matter. Considering that the US government reports unidentified anomal objects (Uaps), I say: Let's invest a billion dollars in establishing their nature through strict scientific research.
If we find that all UAP is created by people, some by opposing nations, at least we will have our algorithms of artificial intelligence (AI) and sensor systems that have great value for national security. On the other hand, even if one in a billion uaps is extraterrestrial origin, his explorers will receive the Nobel Prize. This is a beneficial situation for everyone.
The day before Congress briefing I visited the Pentagon and repeated these feelings. If we do not find evidence for extraterrestrial technologies, I will be proud that the AI tools and sensors developed will be used to protect our nation against ground threats.
The UAP scientific study offers a unique opportunity to spend a billion dollars on artificial intelligence and border science and make taxpayers ecstatic. There is no major scientific question about which society depends than “Are we alone?” If there are smarter children on our space block, we can learn from them.
Recovering the extraterrestrial gadget can provide us with access to advanced technologies faster than it would take us to develop from scratch. Our current scientific knowledge is an island in the Ocean of ignorance. A civilization that has benefited from the millennia of science after discovering quantum mechanics may have quantum engineers who attach negative masses to the load and allow it Escape gravity without fuel.
The briefing was attended by representatives of honorary chambers Anna Paulina Luna, Nick Begich, Eric Budison and Tim Burchett. I showed the title page of the New-York Times magazine: “How did Professor Harvard become the world leading alien hunter?” And I mentioned that I was not satisfied with this reporting and told the editor: If we cannot trust what you publish about science, how can we believe what you publish about politics?
New scientific knowledge does not fall into our knees. I repeated the novel variant of my plant with Elon Musk, namely I am ready to put 1% of my net value in relation to 1% of its net value and check if Elon is the most talented space entrepreneur from the great explosion, 13.8 billion years ago.
Then I described the extensive work done by Galileo project Team, including construction and service of three novel UAP observer, which will gather novel data Several million facilities Annually, monitoring the heaven in infrared, optical, radio and audio as well as searching for protruding values using the latest AI software.
The Galileo project also plans to search for vast elements of the IM1 intersteer meteor using a robot with a video channel. I finished with my photo at sunset with Art Wright, who was the head of the event of our first ocean expedition to recover Sferle from the IM1 Fire Site in the Pacific Ocean. Art is a solution to the problem, admirable to the virtue signaling in today's culture. His approach is the one that I will accept to solve the secrecy of uaps.
In an interview with the podcast at the beginning of this week I was asked: “Why would you like to be remembered?” My answer was: “For my future work. The best is yet.”
Many of my colleagues accept what they consider the voice of reason in avoiding UAP. At the same time, they brush anomalies under the rug, cataloging objects almost earth with unusual trajectories as “empty rubbish bags”-saging that these are broken pieces of human satellites pushed through sunlight, and marking anomal interstellar objects, such as interactional objects, such as interstellar objects “ Oumuamua – who showed a similar departure from the sun as “Dark comets“.
Starting from this summer, the Rubin Observatory in Chile, financed by NSF and Doe, can find family members “Oumuamua, who could be further examined using the webb telescope. Marking the anomalies with names that suggest conventional interpretations, and then insist so that there is nothing anomal in them, it is not a smart long -term strategy. Ignorance.Naked, if movement.“
According to the scientific tradition established by Galileo, we must look for more evidence to determine the anomalies. In connection with the investment of a billion dollars in solving the character of UAP, we will probably gain novel knowledge. In response to the moderator's question, Lue Elizondo, I emphasized the hope that the younger generation will find the nature of UAP from harsh curiosity and without imprisonment in warning. That is why I am glad that I can build the Galileo project observatory in the novel Campus of Scientific Education near Purdue University, Indiana, was aimed at inspiring the next generation of intriguing children.
Every day I choose thinking like a child and I do not interpret anomalies as manifestations of known things. This is not an effortless choice, surrounded by colleagues who pretend to behave like adults in the room and insist that they know the answer from above.
Image Source: Pixabay.com
