The latest article from Wall Street Journal, “Disinformation of the pentagon that fueled the mythology of UFO America“(June 6, 2025), he claims that the American army has used UFO stories to hide secret weapons programs. But deeper analysis reveals something much more disturbing – the article itself may be part of a modern campaign of disinformation of the Pentagon, manipulating the perception of society under the indulgence of transparency.
The WSJ report confirms that since the 1950s Pentagon has been distributed false photos and counterfeit stories of UFOs – such as the changed images of the “flying saucer” in area 51 – to mislead public and hidden advanced weapon designs, such as the Stealth aircraft. Instead of hiding foreign technology, the army protected the secrets of national security from the Cold War.
The investigation in the Pentagon case, headed by the chief scientist Sean Kirkpatrick, showed that military officials disseminated disinformation and probably institutional programs, fueling the decades of UFO myths. Some of these myths could intentionally flourish to mistakenly manage foreign intelligence, especially the Soviet Union.
In 2023, investigators discovered a strange ritual “delving” in programs classified by Air Force, in which modern commanders showed false photos from anti -than -agreed vehicles and ordered them to keep them secret – more disseminating false narratives. Pentagon is planning to publish a complementary report soon, but his UAP report (unidentified anomal phenomena) 2024) has already omitted critical details, raising suspicions.
Absolute Bomshell on @WSJ First page today. The entire 78-year movement of “US-Gov-Has-Alien-Tech” was a PSYOP-how I always argued and as WSJ has just proved.
Unfortunately, the promoters of frauds et/UFOs will only double.
Reject them: https://t.co/tedjbq44uv pic.twitter.com/unka67GMGP
– Daniel O'Connor (@dsdoconnor) June 7, 2025
Rejecting UFO as a prank for the Cold War
While the WSJ article admits earlier fraud, it also pushes a modern narrative: all the main UFO incidents – including nuclear rocket disruptions – there were either incorrect observations, military jokes or misunderstandings. This double tactic (admitting to the past lies when rejecting contemporary evidence) does not explain the truth – it intends even more.
One of the most glaring distortions includes the Malmstrom Air Force Base incident from 1967, in which ten nuclear missiles suddenly closed during the reported UFO meeting. Captain Robert Salas, a service officer tonight, repeatedly stated that a great object was floated above the object before the missiles operated.
However, WSJ resembles a modern Pentagon claim: that the incident was only a test of the electromagnetic impulse (EMP). This explanation falls under control:
EMP causes eternal damage – not only temporarily turn off systems. A degreased test of the Air Force confirms that the EMPS Fry Electronics irreversibly, but Malmstrom's missiles soon returned to normal surgery.
The United States already knew the effects of EMP from the Prime Starfish test in 1962, in which Nuke won the street lights in Hawaii (900 miles) at a great height and destroyed satellites. If Malmstrom was hit by EMP, the damage would be catastrophic and strong.
Why would the Pentagon test EMP on live nuclear missiles during the Cold War? If they wanted EMP data, they had remote test places – not lively rocket silos.
Soviet UFO-Nuke incident: ignored because it doesn't fit
The silence of the pentagon in similar incidents abroad is even more condemning. In 1982, near Byelokorowiczs, Soviet Ukraine, UFO apparently He caused a sequence of rocket premiere, putting nuclear weapons in counting for 15 terrifying seconds before they have a mysteriously reset. ABC News announced this in 1994, but WSJ and Pentagon completely ignore it – because it is contrary to their narrative.
The scientific coalition for UAP (SCU) research was analyzed 590 documented UFO cases (1945–1975) and statistically significant UFO activity near nuclear objects-laboratory, rocket silos and implementation base. It was not accidental; He showed a targeted supervision of unknown intelligence.
However, WSJ completely omits this evidence, strengthening the idea that the article is not investigating journalism, but narrative control.
Does the Pentagon employ WSJ like Project Mockingbird?
The WSJ song time is suspicious. Sources indicate that the Pentagon Anomalies Resolution Bureau (AARO) has already submitted to Congress part II of its classified UFO report. The WSJ article can be prepared by society for a disinfected version, conditioning the acceptance of the preferred history of the Pentagon.
It's mirrors Project MockingbirdThe CIA program that infiltrated the main media during the Cold War to plant government propaganda. A piece of WSJ, with selective facts and a dismissive tone, perfectly matches this pattern.
Discreting unmasking – develop witnesses such as Salas as misleading or stunned, using ridicule to silence them.
Control the narrative – reduce UFO history to “Psikus with the Cold War” to avoid analyzing current secret programs.
Among the confusion – give some lies, but do not offer any real answers, keeping public opinion in the obscure.
The Pentagon is not neat – his fraud is decorated. WSJ's article is not a breakthrough; This is a psychological surgery. If we want the truth, Congress must conduct a formal investigation into the ongoing disinformation campaign of the Pentagon.
I am not saying that WSJ deliberately distributes disinformation. But the fact that the Pentagon can employ WSJ as a fraud platform is very likely to me. The American nation deserves the whole story-no further arranged hiding.
Image Source: Pixabay.com
